The Goodix GT9xx input driver in drivers/input/input_gt911.c reads the touch point count from the controller's status register and masks it with GT911_TOUCH_POINTS_MSK (0x0F), yielding a value of 0..15. In gt911_process() that value is used directly as the loop bound for filling point_reg[], a stack array sized to CONFIG_INPUT_GT911_MAX_TOUCH_POINTS, whose Kconfig range is 1..5 with a default of 1. No other check constrains the count; the driver relied only on a comment asserting that the controller had been programmed at init to report no more points than configured.
Each loop iteration issues an I2C read of eight bytes straight into point_reg[i], so a controller that reports more points than the array holds causes up to 112 bytes of peer-supplied data to be written past the end of the array, over the stack frame of gt911_process() in the system workqueue thread. Two further loops then read out of bounds from the same array. Triggering it requires control of, or the ability to substitute, the I2C touch controller — plausible on the many supported boards where the GT9xx panel is a pluggable display module or shield rather than an on-PCB part; a spoofed device need only answer the init probes with a supported product ID and a checksum-valid config blob. The same overflow can also occur non-adversarially, with a GT9271-class panel that ignores the driver's touch-count programming and reports up to ten points, or with bus corruption of the single status byte.
The impact is an out-of-bounds stack write with fully attacker-chosen content executing at kernel privilege, i.e. potential control-flow hijack on the host MCU, in addition to out-of-bounds reads and crashes. The attack vector is physical/local hardware access only; there is no network, USB, or syscall path to the defect. The fix clamps the reported count with min() against CONFIG_INPUT_GT911_MAX_TOUCH_POINTS before any array indexing.
{
"cna_assigner": "zephyr",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"osv_generated_from": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/19xxx/CVE-2026-19576.json"
}"https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2026-19576.json"
[
{
"deprecated": false,
"digest": {
"function_hash": "203856251774733651598340849956057883786",
"length": 1882
},
"id": "CVE-2026-19576-30856f41",
"signature_type": "Function",
"signature_version": "v1",
"source": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/42b52d571eb2113012c135276693042fd372fdea",
"target": {
"file": "drivers/input/input_gt911.c",
"function": "gt911_process"
}
},
{
"deprecated": false,
"digest": {
"line_hashes": [
"99356781367019773215046763931201275788",
"77007269605251613776970190248726227221",
"43174735068554782563049002681270800488",
"108633832963724750192690637438052353343",
"213552100224391391428039970429943887425",
"150287018749581066797734281458241897327",
"267424511662856243521367447217830587761",
"306671073461297214063756400353821817840"
],
"threshold": 0.9
},
"id": "CVE-2026-19576-3f5c8895",
"signature_type": "Line",
"signature_version": "v1",
"source": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/42b52d571eb2113012c135276693042fd372fdea",
"target": {
"file": "drivers/input/input_gt911.c"
}
}
]
"2026-10-13T07:01:32Z"