The user-mode verifier for the peci_transfer() system call, z_vrfy_peci_transfer() in drivers/peci/peci_handlers.c, checked only the device object permission and copied the caller-supplied struct peci_msg with k_usermode_from_copy(). That copy validates the outer structure only; the buf pointers and len values inside the embedded struct peci_buf members tx_buffer and rx_buffer remained fully caller-controlled and were passed unchecked to the driver.
Every in-tree PECI driver dereferences those pointers in supervisor mode: peci_npcx_transfer() in drivers/peci/peci_npcx.c and peci_it8xxx2_transfer() in drivers/peci/peci_ite_it8xxx2.c copy hardware bytes into rx_buffer.buf[i] and read command bytes out of tx_buffer.buf[i], and peci_xec_read()/peci_xec_write() in drivers/peci/peci_mchp_xec.c do the same with no bound on rx_buffer.len at all. A user-mode thread that has been granted the PECI device object — the normal way an application exposes a device under CONFIG_USERSPACE — could therefore point rx_buffer.buf at kernel data structures and have the driver write hardware-supplied bytes there, or point tx_buffer.buf at kernel memory and have its contents pushed onto the PECI/eSPI out-of-band bus.
The impact is a full user-mode-to-kernel escape: an arbitrary kernel write primitive (integrity and, through it, code execution at supervisor privilege), an arbitrary kernel read disclosed to a PECI bus observer, and a trivially reachable supervisor-mode fault if an unmapped address is supplied. Exploitation requires CONFIG_USERSPACE=y, one of the PECI drivers enabled (CONFIG_PECI_NPCX, CONFIG_PECI_XEC or CONFIG_PECI_ITE_IT8XXX2), and local code execution in a user-mode thread holding the PECI device.
The fix adds K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_READ() and K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE() checks over the two embedded buffers, with a size_add_overflow() guard on the frame-check-sequence byte accounted for in the RX length.
{
"cna_assigner": "zephyr",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-822"
],
"osv_generated_from": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/19xxx/CVE-2026-19676.json"
}{
"extracted_events": [
{
"range": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"last_affected": "4.4.2"
}
],
"source": "AFFECTED_FIELD",
"strategy": "StandardRange"
},
{
"range": [
{
"fixed": "d7faf323d52b7e8845a63b1f854a82bdda44c261"
}
],
"source": "REFERENCES_COMMIT"
}
]
}
"https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2026-19676.json"
[
{
"deprecated": false,
"digest": {
"line_hashes": [
"193817567228127920469200340415201109375",
"299647773395740300829229593761069990325",
"136072482116092086039328699603181677520"
],
"threshold": 0.9
},
"id": "CVE-2026-19676-22ae1fbd",
"signature_type": "Line",
"signature_version": "v1",
"source": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/d7faf323d52b7e8845a63b1f854a82bdda44c261",
"target": {
"file": "drivers/peci/peci_handlers.c"
}
},
{
"deprecated": false,
"digest": {
"function_hash": "90785820985704767109937369812603996206",
"length": 228
},
"id": "CVE-2026-19676-b8f71b73",
"signature_type": "Function",
"signature_version": "v1",
"source": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/d7faf323d52b7e8845a63b1f854a82bdda44c261",
"target": {
"file": "drivers/peci/peci_handlers.c",
"function": "z_vrfy_peci_transfer"
}
}
]
"2026-10-22T07:28:28Z"