DEBIAN-CVE-2024-39486
- Source
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-39486
- Import Source
- https://storage.googleapis.com/debian-osv/debian-cve-osv/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-39486.json
- JSON Data
- https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-39486
- Upstream
- Published
- 2024-07-06T10:15:03Z
- Modified
- 2026-09-15T09:03:07Z
- Severity
-
- 7.0 (High) CVSS_V3 - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H CVSS Calculator
- Summary
- [none]
- Details
-
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/drm_file: Fix pid refcounting race maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, Maxime Ripard mripard@kernel.org, Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de filp->pid is supposed to be a refcounted pointer; however, before this patch, drm_file_update_pid() only increments the refcount of a struct pid after storing a pointer to it in filp->pid and dropping the dev->filelist_mutex, making the following race possible: process A process B ========= ========= begin drm_file_update_pid mutex_lock(&dev->filelist_mutex) rcu_replace_pointer(filp->pid, , 1) mutex_unlock(&dev->filelist_mutex) begin drm_file_update_pid mutex_lock(&dev->filelist_mutex) rcu_replace_pointer(filp->pid, , 1) mutex_unlock(&dev->filelist_mutex) get_pid() synchronize_rcu() put_pid() *** pid B reaches refcount 0 and is freed here *** get_pid() *** UAF *** synchronize_rcu() put_pid() As far as I know, this race can only occur with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y because it requires RCU to detect a quiescent state in code that is not explicitly calling into the scheduler. This race leads to use-after-free of a "struct pid". It is probably somewhat hard to hit because process A has to pass through a synchronize_rcu() operation while process B is between mutex_unlock() and get_pid(). Fix it by ensuring that by the time a pointer to the current task's pid is stored in the file, an extra reference to the pid has been taken. This fix also removes the condition for synchronize_rcu(); I think that optimization is unnecessary complexity, since in that case we would usually have bailed out on the lockless check above.
- References
Affected packages
Debian:13 / linux
Package
- Name
- linux
- Purl
- pkg:deb/debian/linux?arch=source&distro=trixie
Debian:14 / linux
Package
- Name
- linux
- Purl
- pkg:deb/debian/linux?arch=source&distro=forky