It's pretty dodgy to consider this not applicable, because the CVE can easily be exploited.
The vulnerability is in the function is_safe(), which when given a path with symlinks can claim a path
cannot be accessed by another user falsely.
The justification mostly boils down to the function not being supposed to be relied on for security, but
for safety. In other words it's to make sure the user doesn't do stupid things, not to protect against
attackers. There is extra nuance in that the function claims to do some things and not be exhaustive anyway,
but it's documentation does not mention it cannot follow symlinks.
There is no fix upstream or any intention of fixing it, and the fix would almost certainly be a documentation change.
Justification: https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2011/q4/234
Bug report and exploit: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=69106
Vulnerable code: https://github.com/Perl/perl5/blob/blead/cpan/File-Temp/lib/File/Temp.pm
CVE: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-4116