In openclaw@2026.2.25, BlueBubbles group authorization could incorrectly treat DM pairing-store identities as group allowlist identities when dmPolicy=pairing and groupPolicy=allowlist.
A sender that was only DM-paired (not explicitly present in groupAllowFrom) could pass group sender checks for message and reaction ingress.
Per OpenClaw's SECURITY.md trust model, this is a constrained authorization-consistency issue, not a multi-tenant boundary bypass or host-privilege escalation.
openclaw (npm)2026.2.25<= 2026.2.25>= 2026.2.26 (planned next release)Root cause was DM/group allowlist composition where DM pairing-store identities could flow into group authorization decisions.
Fix approach:
groupPolicy=allowlist and dmPolicy=pairing when pairing-store entries are present.groupAllowFrom membership.051fdcc428129446e7c084260f837b7284279ce9patched_versions is pre-set to the planned next release (2026.2.26) so once npm 2026.2.26 is published, this advisory can be published without further content edits.
OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
{
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-03T22:54:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-19T22:16:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
}