commands.allowFrom is documented as a sender authorization allowlist for commands/directives, but command authorization could include ctx.From (conversation identity) as a sender candidate.
When commands.allowFrom contained conversation-like identifiers (for example Discord channel:<id> or WhatsApp group JIDs), command/directive authorization could be granted to participants in that conversation instead of only the intended sender identity.
openclaw (npm)<= 2026.2.22-22026.2.23 (released)Root cause: resolveSenderCandidates() in src/auto-reply/command-auth.ts always included ctx.From in candidate evaluation used by commands.allowFrom authorization checks.
ctx.From is sender-like in some direct-message contexts, but conversation-like in channel/group/thread contexts. This mixed principal handling allowed conversation identifiers to satisfy sender-only authorization.
In affected versions, command/directive authorization could become broader than intended when operators configured commands.allowFrom with conversation identifiers, allowing unintended users in that conversation to run command-only/directive-only flows.
Main branch now treats commands.allowFrom as sender-only:
- ctx.From is no longer included as a general sender candidate.
- ctx.From is only used as fallback when sender fields are absent and the value is not conversation-shaped.
- Regression tests were added for conversation-id denial and direct-message fallback preservation.
08e2aa44e78a9c946d97bea62304e6f533b8fa8epatched_versions is pre-set to the released version (2026.2.23). This advisory now reflects released fix version 2026.2.23.
OpenClaw thanks @jiseoung for reporting.
{
"github_reviewed": true,
"severity": "HIGH",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-639"
],
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-03T23:19:46Z"
}