GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm

Suggest an improvement
Source
https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
Import Source
https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2025/05/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm.json
JSON Data
https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
Aliases
  • CVE-2025-47774
Published
2025-05-16T14:13:29Z
Modified
2025-05-16T14:57:09.053688Z
Severity
  • 2.9 (Low) CVSS_V4 - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P CVSS Calculator
Summary
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Details

Impact

the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319

the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191

the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).

the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code

counter: public(uint256)

@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
    b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
    return b

def side_effect() -> uint256:
    self.counter += 1
    return 0

the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.

Patches

the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Database specific
{
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-15T18:15:38Z",
    "cwe_ids": [
        "CWE-691"
    ],
    "severity": "LOW",
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-05-16T14:13:29Z"
}
References

Affected packages

PyPI / vyper

Package

Affected ranges

Type
ECOSYSTEM
Events
Introduced
0Unknown introduced version / All previous versions are affected
Last affected
0.4.2rc1

Affected versions

0.*

0.1.0b1
0.1.0b2
0.1.0b3
0.1.0b4
0.1.0b5
0.1.0b6
0.1.0b7
0.1.0b8
0.1.0b9
0.1.0b10
0.1.0b11
0.1.0b12
0.1.0b13
0.1.0b14
0.1.0b15
0.1.0b16
0.1.0b17
0.2.1
0.2.2
0.2.3
0.2.4
0.2.5
0.2.6
0.2.7
0.2.8
0.2.9
0.2.10
0.2.11
0.2.12
0.2.13
0.2.14
0.2.15
0.2.16
0.3.0
0.3.1
0.3.2
0.3.3
0.3.4
0.3.5
0.3.6
0.3.7
0.3.8
0.3.9
0.3.10rc1
0.3.10rc2
0.3.10rc3
0.3.10rc4
0.3.10rc5
0.3.10
0.4.0b1
0.4.0b2
0.4.0b3
0.4.0b4
0.4.0b5
0.4.0b6
0.4.0rc1
0.4.0rc2
0.4.0rc3
0.4.0rc4
0.4.0rc5
0.4.0rc6
0.4.0
0.4.1b1
0.4.1b2
0.4.1b3
0.4.1b4
0.4.1rc1
0.4.1rc2
0.4.1rc3
0.4.1
0.4.2rc1