The generic webhook channel trusts caller-supplied identity fields (sender, chat_id) from the request body and applies authorization checks to those untrusted values. Because authentication is optional and defaults to disabled (auth_token: None), an attacker who can reach POST /webhook can spoof an allowlisted sender and choose arbitrary chat_id values, enabling high-risk message spoofing and potential IDOR-style session/chat routing abuse.
Relevant code paths:
src/channels/webhook.rs:121 sets runtime default auth_token: None.src/config/types.rs:910 also defaults webhook config auth_token to None.src/channels/webhook.rs:224 (validate_auth) explicitly allows requests when no token is configured.src/channels/webhook.rs:128 defines WebhookPayload with identity fields fully controlled by caller input:
sender: Stringchat_id: Stringsrc/channels/webhook.rs:421 performs allowlist authorization using payload.sender.src/channels/webhook.rs:433 and src/channels/webhook.rs:434 create InboundMessage using untrusted payload.sender and payload.chat_id.Why this is vulnerable:
chat_id is also attacker-controlled, so routing/session association can be steered to arbitrary chats/conversations.enabled = truebind_address = "0.0.0.0" (or any reachable interface)port = 9876path = "/webhook"auth_token = null (or omitted)allow_from = ["trusted-user-1"]deny_by_default = truesender and chat_id, without any Authorization header:curl -i -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:9876/webhook" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
--data '{
"message":"FORGED: run privileged workflow",
"sender":"trusted-user-1",
"chat_id":"victim-chat-42"
}'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK.trusted-user-1.chat_id (victim-chat-42).chat_idchat_id.{
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306",
"CWE-345"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-12T16:36:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-12T19:16:17Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
}