Affected component: Sync-in Server v2.3.0, POST /api/app/sync/operation/diff/:id, vulnerable implementation of pathFilters in backend/src/applications/sync/dtos/sync-operations.dto.ts.
In the vulnerable version, the sync diff endpoint accepted a user-controlled regex pattern through pathFilters and compiled it into a RegExp without complexity validation. The resulting regex was then executed synchronously against relative file paths during diff generation.
A catastrophic-backtracking pattern, such as ^(a+)+b, can block the affected Node.js event loop when evaluated against a worst-case path shape. In a single-process deployment, this can make the server unavailable to other users while the regex evaluation is running. Repeated malicious requests can sustain the denial of service.
SyncDiffDto transformed user input directly into a RegExp without validating regex complexity:
// backend/src/applications/sync/dtos/sync-operations.dto.ts
@IsOptional()
@Transform(({ value }) => (typeof value === 'string' && value.length > 0 ? new RegExp(value, 'i') : null))
pathFilters?: RegExp = null
The compiled regex was then executed synchronously during sync diff traversal:
// backend/src/applications/sync/services/sync-manager.service.ts
if (ctx.syncDiff.pathFilters && ctx.syncDiff.pathFilters.test(filePath)) {
Because .test() is synchronous, a catastrophic-backtracking pattern can block the Node.js event loop for the duration of the regex evaluation.
The impact depends on the file paths being tested. For example, the pattern ^(a+)+b is most effective when the sync tree contains a relative path beginning with a long sequence of a characters and not followed by b.
Prerequisites: Valid non-guest account, a registered sync client, and a sync path containing at least one file or directory whose relative path triggers catastrophic backtracking for the supplied pattern.
For the payload ^(a+)+b, an effective test case is a path containing a long name made of repeated a characters.
Steps:
POST /api/app/sync/register with credentials and clientId.POST /api/app/sync/auth/cookie to get a JWT with clientId embedded.a characters.POST /api/app/sync/operation/diff/1
Content-Type: application/json
sync-in-csrf: <csrf-token>
Cookie: sync-in-access=<jwt>
{"secureDiff":false,"firstSync":true,"defaultFilters":[],"pathFilters":"^(a+)+b","snapshot":{}}
Evidence from live test on Sync-in Server v2.3.0, Node.js v24.16.0:
[+] Baseline (no pathFilters): 0.019s, 15 files
[*] Sending ReDoS pattern: ^(a+)+b
[!] TIMEOUT after 20.022s - ReDoS CONFIRMED
# Server state during ReDoS:
$ docker stats sync-in --no-stream
CONTAINER CPU % MEM USAGE
sync-in 398.82% 745.2MiB / 7.709GiB
# Other endpoints did not respond during the timeout window:
$ curl -m 5 http://target:8080/
(exit code 28 - connection timeout)
The container-level CPU spike indicates severe resource saturation while the endpoint was unresponsive. The request timeout demonstrates event-loop blocking during the observed window, but does not by itself prove permanent failure after the malicious request stops.
An authenticated user with desktop sync access can submit a malicious pathFilters regex that blocks the affected Node.js event loop during sync diff generation.
In a single-process deployment, this can prevent other HTTP requests, including health checks, from receiving responses while the regex evaluation is running. Repeated malicious requests can keep the service unavailable and may require administrative intervention.
Validate pathFilters before using the resulting regex during diff traversal.
Recommended controls:
safe-regex2 or an equivalent safety checker.BadRequestException for invalid or unsafe patterns.Example remediation:
@IsOptional()
@Transform(({ value }) => {
if (typeof value !== 'string' || value.length === 0) return null
if (value.length > MAX_PATH_FILTER_PATTERN_LENGTH) {
throw new BadRequestException('Path filter pattern is too long')
}
let pathFilter: RegExp
try {
pathFilter = new RegExp(value, 'i')
} catch {
throw new BadRequestException('Invalid path filter pattern')
}
if (!isSafePattern(pathFilter)) {
throw new BadRequestException('Unsafe path filter pattern')
}
return pathFilter
})
pathFilters?: RegExp = null
Where isSafePattern uses safe-regex2 or equivalent to reject patterns likely to cause catastrophic backtracking, including nested quantifier patterns such as ^(a+)+b.
A regression test should assert that ^(a+)+b is rejected before the regex is used against file paths.
{
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-22T14:47:56Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-21T21:17:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
}