The guard added for CVE-2026-26961 (GHSA-vgpv-f759-9wx3), which rejects multipart requests with more than one boundary parameter, only inspects the part of the Content-Type header after the boundary it extracts. A Content-Type whose first boundary parameter is empty or begins with a quote, semicolon, or comma is skipped by the extraction pattern, so a second boundary parameter is accepted silently and Rack parses the body with a boundary that a conforming parser would not derive from the header.
Rack::Multipart::Parser.parse_boundary extracts the boundary with a regular expression that uses a lazy prefix and a value class excluding ", ;, and ,. For a header such as multipart/form-data; boundary=";boundary=AaB03x" or multipart/form-data; boundary=; boundary=AaB03x, the pattern skips the first boundary= and anchors on the second, and the subsequent check for another boundary= in the remaining text finds nothing. Rack then uses AaB03x.
RFC 9110 parses the first header as a single parameter whose value is ;boundary=AaB03x, which is not a legal boundary under RFC 2046, so the only conformant outcome is rejection. Inspecting intermediaries that implement the standard grammar, such as ModSecurity, see a different boundary or no multipart body at all.
The fix counts boundary= occurrences across the entire header value and rejects the request when there is more than one.
As with CVE-2026-26961, an attacker can craft a multipart request that a web application firewall or other inspecting proxy in front of a Rack application interprets differently from Rack, so form fields and file uploads reach the application without inspection. Rack itself grants no capability beyond that of a well-formed request with the same body. All supported versions, including 2.2, are affected.
Content-Type contains more than one boundary parameter at the reverse proxy.{
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-436"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-11-10T19:26:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-11-09T22:18:41Z",
"severity": "LOW"
}