GHSA-r3g7-r4hr-m258

Suggest an improvement
Source
https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-r3g7-r4hr-m258
Import Source
https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/10/GHSA-r3g7-r4hr-m258/GHSA-r3g7-r4hr-m258.json
JSON Data
https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/GHSA-r3g7-r4hr-m258
Aliases
  • CVE-2026-115478
Published
2026-10-23T18:47:25Z
Modified
2026-10-23T19:00:40Z
Severity
  • 7.1 (High) CVSS_V4 - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N CVSS Calculator
Summary
obsidian-tc: Memory-lifecycle tools overwrite unowned notes or partially commit lifecycle changes
Details

Summary

create_entity, link_entities, rename_entity, unlink_entities and delete_entity regenerate a memory note's body from SQLite at the computed memory/<type>/<name>.md path. When a note already existed at that path and was not owned by the entity being written (a hand-authored note, or an orphan left by a different entity whose name sanitized to the same path), its entire body was overwritten on the next write naming that (type, name), keeping only its frontmatter. Separately, several of these tools inserted or removed their SQLite row before the fallible filesystem step, so a refused note write could leave a relation gone, a retired status committed, or the wrong entity deleted.

Details

  • create_entity and link_entities inserted the SQL row or relation before materialization.
  • rename_entity seeded the destination path with a direct atomic write that bypassed the ownership check, and for a status-only rename could commit a retired status with the note write refused.
  • unlink_entities removed the relation row before discovering the source note's rematerialization would be refused.
  • delete_entity's cascade could delete the target and its relations before a neighbour's note was found to be foreign.

The overwrite exists in every released version since materializeEntity shipped (git show v1.0.1:packages/server/src/memory/materialize.ts).

Impact

An authorized caller with memory-write scope (any agent using the M5 memory tools) can, without intending to, destroy the body of a vault note outside the entity it is writing, and can leave the memory graph inconsistent with the notes on disk. Snapshots-before-write (restore_note) mitigate the overwrite only where snapshots are enabled and the note had been written through obsidian-tc before.

Patches

Fixed in 1.31.4 at the shared primitive: materializeEntity refuses to write over a note whose obsidian_tc_id is missing or belongs to another entity; a new assertNoteOwnership pre-check runs before any SQLite mutation in the three lifecycle tools, so a refusal is a no-op; create_entity and link_entities roll back the row they had inserted. Verified by test/m5-memory-ownership.test.ts, which covers all five call sites and the rollback.

Workarounds

None that preserve the tools. Disabling the write:memory scope for callers prevents the write path entirely.

Credit

Found by the maintainer while building obsidian-tc memory import (PR #978); the vulnerability class was independently confirmed by a cross-vendor adversarial review.

References

  • PR #978 (fix and test), CHANGELOG ## [1.31.4] ### Security
  • packages/server/src/memory/materialize.ts, packages/server/src/tools/m5/memory-lifecycle-tools.ts

Database specific
{
    "cwe_ids":  [
        "CWE-459",
        "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed":  true,
    "github_reviewed_at":  "2026-10-23T18:47:25Z",
    "nvd_published_at":  "2026-10-23T15:17:30Z",
    "severity":  "HIGH"
}
References

Affected packages

npm / obsidian-tc

Package

Affected ranges

Type
SEMVER
Events
Introduced
1.0.1
Fixed
1.31.4

Database specific

last_known_affected_version_range
"<= 1.31.3"
source
"https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/10/GHSA-r3g7-r4hr-m258/GHSA-r3g7-r4hr-m258.json"