The per-CPU message-buffer fallback path uses a 256-byte backup buffer but preserves the original payload size, which can be up to 8KB. If a CPU mismatch occurs, OBI can read beyond the fallback buffer and leak adjacent memory into telemetry.
k_kprobes_http2_buf_size is defined as 256 bytes, the size of the fallback buffer.
Introduces 8KB per-CPU buffer and 256-byte fallback_buf in msg_buffer_t, creating a size mismatch for fallback use.
On CPU mismatch, fallback_buf is used but size is still set to m_buf->real_size (up to 8KB) and passed downstream.
bytes_len (from m_buf->real_size) is used to read payload data from u_buf; if u_buf is the 256B fallback, this can over-read and leak memory into telemetry.
real_size is set up to 8192 bytes and stored with cpu_id; fallback_buf only contains 256 bytes.
Local testing with an AddressSanitizer user-space PoC reproduced the same class of size-mismatch over-read as the vulnerable fallback-buffer path. That result is sufficient to ground the advisory in a fresh local reproduction even though the exact end-to-end eBPF path still depends on host BPF capabilities.
To reproduce the validated behavior locally:
fallback_buf[256] and real_sizereal_sizereal_size bytes from that 256-byte backing store under ASanAn equivalent reproducer is:
// save as /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob.c
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
struct msg_buffer {
unsigned char fallback_buf[256];
uint16_t pos;
uint16_t real_size;
uint32_t cpu_id;
};
int main(void) {
struct msg_buffer m = {0};
unsigned char sink[8192];
memset(m.fallback_buf, 'A', sizeof(m.fallback_buf));
m.real_size = 4096;
memcpy(sink, m.fallback_buf, m.real_size);
printf("copied %u bytes from a 256-byte fallback buffer\n", m.real_size);
return 0;
}
Compile and run with ASan:
cc -fsanitize=address -O1 -g -o /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob.c
ASAN_OPTIONS=abort_on_error=1 /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob
Expected result:
AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow or stack-buffer-overflow
That user-space PoC matches the size-mismatch condition in the vulnerable code path, even though the exact end-to-end eBPF runtime path still requires host BPF attach/load capability.
This is a confidentiality issue in the HTTP tracing path. The vulnerable read occurs in OBI's local fallback-buffer handling when context propagation is enabled, the tpinjector sock_msg path is active, HTTP large-buffer capture is configured with a non-zero size, and a CPU mismatch occurs between producer and consumer contexts. Under those conditions, OBI can over-read from the fallback buffer and export unrelated memory through telemetry.
{
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125",
"CWE-130"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-18T20:11:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-02T16:16:42Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
}