If a Content-Length header is present in the original HTTP/2 request, the field is not validated by Http2MultiplexHandler
as it is propagated up. This is fine as long as the request is not proxied through as HTTP/1.1.
If the request comes in as an HTTP/2 stream, gets converted into the HTTP/1.1 domain objects (HttpRequest
, HttpContent
, etc.) via Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec
and then sent up to the child channel's pipeline and proxied through a remote peer as HTTP/1.1 this may result in request smuggling.
In a proxy case, users may assume the content-length is validated somehow, which is not the case. If the request is forwarded to a backend channel that is a HTTP/1.1 connection, the Content-Length now has meaning and needs to be checked.
An attacker can smuggle requests inside the body as it gets downgraded from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1. A sample attack request looks like:
POST / HTTP/2
:authority:: externaldomain.com
Content-Length: 4
asdfGET /evilRedirect HTTP/1.1
Host: internaldomain.com
Users are only affected if all of this is true
:
* HTTP2MultiplexCodec
or Http2FrameCodec
is used
* Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec
is used to convert to HTTP/1.1 objects
* These HTTP/1.1 objects are forwarded to another remote peer.
This has been patched in 4.1.60.Final
The user can do the validation by themselves by implementing a custom ChannelInboundHandler
that is put in the ChannelPipeline
behind Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec
.
Related change to workaround the problem: https://github.com/Netflix/zuul/pull/980
{ "nvd_published_at": "2021-03-09T19:15:00Z", "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-444" ], "severity": "MODERATE", "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2021-03-09T18:47:09Z" }