JLSEC-2026-260
- Source
- https://github.com/JuliaLang/SecurityAdvisories.jl/blob/main/advisories/published/2026/JLSEC-2026-260.md
- Import Source
- https://github.com/JuliaLang/SecurityAdvisories.jl/tree/generated/osv/2026/JLSEC-2026-260.json
- JSON Data
- https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/JLSEC-2026-260
- Upstream
- Published
- 2026-04-27T18:33:55.942Z
- Modified
- 2026-04-27T19:02:36.040384288Z
- Severity
-
- 5.9 (Medium) CVSS_V3 - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H CVSS Calculator
- Summary
- Issue summary: A TLS 1.3 connection using certificate compression can be forced to allocate a...
- Details
-
Issue summary: A TLS 1.3 connection using certificate compression can be forced to allocate a large buffer before decompression without checking against the configured certificate size limit.
Impact summary: An attacker can cause per-connection memory allocations of up to approximately 22 MiB and extra CPU work, potentially leading to service degradation or resource exhaustion (Denial of Service).
In affected configurations, the peer-supplied uncompressed certificate length from a CompressedCertificate message is used to grow a heap buffer prior to decompression. This length is not bounded by the maxcertlist setting, which otherwise constrains certificate message sizes. An attacker can exploit this to cause large per-connection allocations followed by handshake failure. No memory corruption or information disclosure occurs.
This issue only affects builds where TLS 1.3 certificate compression is compiled in (i.e., not OPENSSLNOCOMP_ALG) and at least one compression algorithm (brotli, zlib, or zstd) is available, and where the compression extension is negotiated. Both clients receiving a server CompressedCertificate and servers in mutual TLS scenarios receiving a client CompressedCertificate are affected. Servers that do not request client certificates are not vulnerable to client-initiated attacks.
Users can mitigate this issue by setting SSLOPNORXCERTIFICATE_COMPRESSION to disable receiving compressed certificates.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue, as the TLS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
- Database specific
{ "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "sources": [ { "id": "CVE-2025-66199", "html_url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66199", "published": "2026-01-27T16:16:15.777Z", "modified": "2026-02-02T18:37:19.613Z", "imported": "2026-04-27T16:32:48.853Z", "url": "https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?cveId=CVE-2025-66199", "database_specific": { "status": "Analyzed" } }, { "id": "GHSA-5888-36j9-c92p", "html_url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5888-36j9-c92p", "imported": "2026-04-27T16:33:30.334Z", "modified": "2026-01-29T18:32:44Z", "published": "2026-01-27T18:32:15Z", "url": "https://api.github.com/advisories/GHSA-5888-36j9-c92p" }, { "id": "EUVD-2025-206398", "html_url": "https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/vulnerability/EUVD-2025-206398", "imported": "2026-04-27T16:33:07.127Z", "modified": "2026-01-29T15:03:51Z", "published": "2026-01-27T16:01:22Z", "url": "https://euvdservices.enisa.europa.eu/api/enisaid?id=EUVD-2025-206398" } ] }- References
-
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5888-36j9-c92p
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3ed1f75249932b155eef993a8e66a99cb98bfef4
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6184a4fb08ee6d7bca570d931a4e8bef40b64451
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/895150b5e021d16b52fb32b97e1dd12f20448be5
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/966a2478046c311ed7dae50c457d0db4cafbf7e4
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66199
- https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt