A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1 when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.
{ "availability": "No subscription required", "ubuntu_priority": "medium", "binaries": [ { "binary_version": "2.75-1ubuntu0.16.04.7", "binary_name": "dnsmasq" }, { "binary_version": "2.75-1ubuntu0.16.04.7", "binary_name": "dnsmasq-base" }, { "binary_version": "2.75-1ubuntu0.16.04.7", "binary_name": "dnsmasq-utils" } ] }
{ "availability": "No subscription required", "ubuntu_priority": "medium", "binaries": [ { "binary_version": "2.79-1ubuntu0.2", "binary_name": "dnsmasq" }, { "binary_version": "2.79-1ubuntu0.2", "binary_name": "dnsmasq-base" }, { "binary_version": "2.79-1ubuntu0.2", "binary_name": "dnsmasq-base-lua" }, { "binary_version": "2.79-1ubuntu0.2", "binary_name": "dnsmasq-utils" } ] }
{ "availability": "No subscription required", "ubuntu_priority": "medium", "binaries": [ { "binary_version": "2.80-1.1ubuntu1.2", "binary_name": "dnsmasq" }, { "binary_version": "2.80-1.1ubuntu1.2", "binary_name": "dnsmasq-base" }, { "binary_version": "2.80-1.1ubuntu1.2", "binary_name": "dnsmasq-base-lua" }, { "binary_version": "2.80-1.1ubuntu1.2", "binary_name": "dnsmasq-utils" } ] }