UBUNTU-CVE-2026-2673

Source
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-2673
Import Source
https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices/blob/main/osv/cve/2026/UBUNTU-CVE-2026-2673.json
JSON Data
https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/UBUNTU-CVE-2026-2673
Upstream
Downstream
Related
Published
2026-03-13T19:54:00Z
Modified
2026-04-13T12:51:11.794372Z
Severity
  • 7.5 (High) CVSS_V3 - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N CVSS Calculator
  • Ubuntu - low
Summary
[none]
Details

Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.

References

Affected packages

Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS / nodejs

Package

Name
nodejs
Purl
pkg:deb/ubuntu/nodejs@12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2?arch=source&distro=esm-apps/jammy

Affected ranges

Type
ECOSYSTEM
Events
Introduced
0Unknown introduced version / All previous versions are affected

Affected versions

12.*
12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu1
12.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu1
12.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu3
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu2
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.3
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.4
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6
12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2

Ecosystem specific

{
    "binaries": [
        {
            "binary_version": "12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2",
            "binary_name": "libnode-dev"
        },
        {
            "binary_version": "12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2",
            "binary_name": "libnode72"
        },
        {
            "binary_version": "12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2",
            "binary_name": "nodejs"
        }
    ],
    "priority_reason": "OpenSSL developers have rated this as being a low severity issue"
}

Database specific

source
"https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices/blob/main/osv/cve/2026/UBUNTU-CVE-2026-2673.json"

Ubuntu:25.10 / openssl

Package

Name
openssl
Purl
pkg:deb/ubuntu/openssl@3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3?arch=source&distro=questing

Affected ranges

Type
ECOSYSTEM
Events
Introduced
0Unknown introduced version / All previous versions are affected
Fixed
3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3

Affected versions

3.*
3.4.1-1ubuntu3
3.5.0-2ubuntu1
3.5.2-1ubuntu1
3.5.3-1ubuntu2
3.5.3-1ubuntu3

Ecosystem specific

{
    "binaries": [
        {
            "binary_version": "3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3",
            "binary_name": "libssl-dev"
        },
        {
            "binary_version": "3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3",
            "binary_name": "libssl3t64"
        },
        {
            "binary_version": "3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3",
            "binary_name": "openssl"
        },
        {
            "binary_version": "3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3",
            "binary_name": "openssl-provider-legacy"
        }
    ],
    "priority_reason": "OpenSSL developers have rated this as being a low severity issue",
    "availability": "No subscription required"
}

Database specific

source
"https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices/blob/main/osv/cve/2026/UBUNTU-CVE-2026-2673.json"