The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock
Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it's very unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to bad calculations. It's always a fixed value based on the block size so we can just check that it's the expected value.
Tested with:
mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb
for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do
gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb
mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test && umount /mnt/test
done
Before this patch we get a withdraw after
[ 76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block [ 76.413681] bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4) [ 76.413681] function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492
and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like
[ 76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19 [ 76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
After the patch, these complaints don't appear, mount fails immediately and we get an explanation in dmesg.(CVE-2022-49769)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
misc/vmw_vmci: fix an infoleak in vmci_host_do_receive_datagram()
struct vmci_event_qp allocated by qp_notify_peer() contains padding,
which may carry uninitialized data to the userspace, as observed by
KMSAN:
BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user ./include/linux/instrumented.h:121 instrument_copy_to_user ./include/linux/instrumented.h:121 _copy_to_user+0x5f/0xb0 lib/usercopy.c:33 copy_to_user ./include/linux/uaccess.h:169 vmci_host_do_receive_datagram drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c:431 vmci_host_unlocked_ioctl+0x33d/0x43d0 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c:925 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 ...
Uninit was stored to memory at: kmemdup+0x74/0xb0 mm/util.c:131 dg_dispatch_as_host drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:271 vmci_datagram_dispatch+0x4f8/0xfc0 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:339 qp_notify_peer+0x19a/0x290 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:1479 qp_broker_attach drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:1662 qp_broker_alloc+0x2977/0x2f30 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:1750 vmci_qp_broker_alloc+0x96/0xd0 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:1940 vmci_host_do_alloc_queuepair drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c:488 vmci_host_unlocked_ioctl+0x24fd/0x43d0 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c:927 ...
Local variable ev created at: qp_notify_peer+0x54/0x290 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:1456 qp_broker_attach drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:1662 qp_broker_alloc+0x2977/0x2f30 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:1750
Bytes 28-31 of 48 are uninitialized Memory access of size 48 starts at ffff888035155e00 Data copied to user address 0000000020000100
Use memset() to prevent the infoleaks.
Also speculatively fix qp_notify_peer_local(), which may suffer from the same problem.(CVE-2022-49788)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: hyperv: fix possible memory leak in mousevsc_probe()
If hid_add_device() returns error, it should call hid_destroy_device() to free hid_dev which is allocated in hid_allocate_device().(CVE-2022-49874)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: sch_sfq: move the limit validation
It is not sufficient to directly validate the limit on the data that the user passes as it can be updated based on how the other parameters are changed.
Move the check at the end of the configuration update process to also catch scenarios where the limit is indirectly updated, for example with the following configurations:
tc qdisc add dev dummy0 handle 1: root sfq limit 2 flows 1 depth 1 tc qdisc add dev dummy0 handle 1: root sfq limit 2 flows 1 divisor 1
This fixes the following syzkaller reported crash:
------------[ cut here ]------------ UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/sched/sch_sfq.c:203:6 index 65535 is out of range for type 'struct sfq_head[128]' CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 3037 Comm: syz.2.16 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 12/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:120 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xf5/0x120 lib/ubsan.c:429 sfq_link net/sched/sch_sfq.c:203 [inline] sfq_dec+0x53c/0x610 net/sched/sch_sfq.c:231 sfq_dequeue+0x34e/0x8c0 net/sched/sch_sfq.c:493 sfq_reset+0x17/0x60 net/sched/sch_sfq.c:518 qdisc_reset+0x12e/0x600 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1035 tbf_reset+0x41/0x110 net/sched/sch_tbf.c:339 qdisc_reset+0x12e/0x600 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1035 dev_reset_queue+0x100/0x1b0 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1311 netdev_for_each_tx_queue include/linux/netdevice.h:2590 [inline] dev_deactivate_many+0x7e5/0xe70 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1375(CVE-2025-37752)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dm-bufio: don't schedule in atomic context
A BUG was reported as below when CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and try_verify_in_tasklet are enabled. [ 129.444685][ T934] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at drivers/md/dm-bufio.c:2421 [ 129.444723][ T934] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 934, name: kworker/1:4 [ 129.444740][ T934] preempt_count: 201, expected: 0 [ 129.444756][ T934] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [ 129.444781][ T934] Preemption disabled at: [ 129.444789][ T934] [<ffffffd816231900>] shrink_work+0x21c/0x248 [ 129.445167][ T934] kernel BUG at kernel/sched/walt/walt_debug.c:16! [ 129.445183][ T934] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 129.445204][ T934] Skip md ftrace buffer dump for: 0x1609e0 [ 129.447348][ T934] CPU: 1 PID: 934 Comm: kworker/1:4 Tainted: G W OE 6.6.56-android15-8-o-g6f82312b30b9-debug #1 1400000003000000474e5500b3187743670464e8 [ 129.447362][ T934] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Parrot QRD, Alpha-M (DT) [ 129.447373][ T934] Workqueue: dm_bufio_cache shrink_work [ 129.447394][ T934] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 129.447406][ T934] pc : android_rvh_schedule_bug+0x0/0x8 [sched_walt_debug] [ 129.447435][ T934] lr : __traceiter_android_rvh_schedule_bug+0x44/0x6c [ 129.447451][ T934] sp : ffffffc0843dbc90 [ 129.447459][ T934] x29: ffffffc0843dbc90 x28: ffffffffffffffff x27: 0000000000000c8b [ 129.447479][ T934] x26: 0000000000000040 x25: ffffff804b3d6260 x24: ffffffd816232b68 [ 129.447497][ T934] x23: ffffff805171c5b4 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffffd816231900 [ 129.447517][ T934] x20: ffffff80306ba898 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffc084159030 [ 129.447535][ T934] x17: 00000000d2b5dd1f x16: 00000000d2b5dd1f x15: ffffffd816720358 [ 129.447554][ T934] x14: 0000000000000004 x13: ffffff89ef978000 x12: 0000000000000003 [ 129.447572][ T934] x11: ffffffd817a823c4 x10: 0000000000000202 x9 : 7e779c5735de9400 [ 129.447591][ T934] x8 : ffffffd81560d004 x7 : 205b5d3938373434 x6 : ffffffd8167397c8 [ 129.447610][ T934] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : ffffffc0843db9e0 [ 129.447629][ T934] x2 : 0000000000002f15 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 129.447647][ T934] Call trace: [ 129.447655][ T934] android_rvh_schedule_bug+0x0/0x8 [sched_walt_debug 1400000003000000474e550080cce8a8a78606b6] [ 129.447681][ T934] __might_resched+0x190/0x1a8 [ 129.447694][ T934] shrink_work+0x180/0x248 [ 129.447706][ T934] process_one_work+0x260/0x624 [ 129.447718][ T934] worker_thread+0x28c/0x454 [ 129.447729][ T934] kthread+0x118/0x158 [ 129.447742][ T934] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 129.447761][ T934] Code: ???????? ???????? ???????? d2b5dd1f (d4210000) [ 129.447772][ T934] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
dm_bufio_lock will call spin_lock_bh when try_verify_in_tasklet is enabled, and __scan will be called in atomic context.(CVE-2025-37928)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: fix resource leak in blk_register_queue() error path
When registering a queue fails after blk_mq_sysfs_register() is successful but the function later encounters an error, we need to clean up the blk_mq_sysfs resources.
Add the missing blk_mq_sysfs_unregister() call in the error path to properly clean up these resources and prevent a memory leak.(CVE-2025-37980)
{
"severity": "Medium"
}{
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.5.0.0329.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
}