CVE-2025-21839

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop

Move the conditional loading of hardware DR6 with the guest's DR6 value out of the core .vcpu_run() loop to fix a bug where KVM can load hardware with a stale vcpu->arch.dr6.

When the guest accesses a DR and host userspace isn't debugging the guest, KVM disables DR interception and loads the guest's values into hardware on VM-Enter and saves them on VM-Exit. This allows the guest to access DRs at will, e.g. so that a sequence of DR accesses to configure a breakpoint only generates one VM-Exit.

For DR0-DR3, the logic/behavior is identical between VMX and SVM, and also identical between KVMDEBUGREGBPENABLED (userspace debugging the guest) and KVMDEBUGREGWONTEXIT (guest using DRs), and so KVM handles loading DR0-DR3 in common code, outside of the core kvmx86ops.vcpu_run() loop.

But for DR6, the guest's value doesn't need to be loaded into hardware for KVMDEBUGREGBPENABLED, and SVM provides a dedicated VMCB field whereas VMX requires software to manually load the guest value, and so loading the guest's value into DR6 is handled by {svm,vmx}vcpurun(), i.e. is done _inside the core run loop.

Unfortunately, saving the guest values on VM-Exit is initiated by common x86, again outside of the core run loop. If the guest modifies DR6 (in hardware, when DR interception is disabled), and then the next VM-Exit is a fastpath VM-Exit, KVM will reload hardware DR6 with vcpu->arch.dr6 and clobber the guest's actual value.

The bug shows up primarily with nested VMX because KVM handles the VMX preemption timer in the fastpath, and the window between hardware DR6 being modified (in guest context) and DR6 being read by guest software is orders of magnitude larger in a nested setup. E.g. in non-nested, the VMX preemption timer would need to fire precisely between #DB injection and the #DB handler's read of DR6, whereas with a KVM-on-KVM setup, the window where hardware DR6 is "dirty" extends all the way from L1 writing DR6 to VMRESUME (in L1).

L1's view:
==========
<L1 disables DR interception>
       CPU 0/KVM-7289    [023] d....  2925.640961: kvm_entry: vcpu 0

A: L1 Writes DR6 CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640963: <hack>: Set DRs, DR6 = 0xffff0ff1

B: CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640967: kvmexit: vcpu 0 reason EXTERNALINTERRUPT intr_info 0x800000ec

D: L1 reads DR6, arch.dr6 = 0 CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640969: <hack>: Sync DRs, DR6 = 0xffff0ff0

       CPU 0/KVM-7289    [023] d....  2925.640976: kvm_entry: vcpu 0
L2 reads DR6, L1 disables DR interception
       CPU 0/KVM-7289    [023] d....  2925.640980: kvm_exit: vcpu 0 reason DR_ACCESS info1 0x0000000000000216
       CPU 0/KVM-7289    [023] d....  2925.640983: kvm_entry: vcpu 0

       CPU 0/KVM-7289    [023] d....  2925.640983: <hack>: Set DRs, DR6 = 0xffff0ff0

L2 detects failure
       CPU 0/KVM-7289    [023] d....  2925.640987: kvm_exit: vcpu 0 reason HLT
L1 reads DR6 (confirms failure)
       CPU 0/KVM-7289    [023] d....  2925.640990: <hack>: Sync DRs, DR6 = 0xffff0ff0

L0's view:
==========
L2 reads DR6, arch.dr6 = 0
      CPU 23/KVM-5046    [001] d....  3410.005610: kvm_exit: vcpu 23 reason DR_ACCESS info1 0x0000000000000216
      CPU 23/KVM-5046    [001] .....  3410.005610: kvm_nested_vmexit: vcpu 23 reason DR_ACCESS info1 0x0000000000000216

L2 => L1 nested VM-Exit
      CPU 23/KVM-5046    [001] .....  3410.005610: kvm_nested_vmexit_inject: reason: DR_ACCESS ext_inf1: 0x0000000000000216

      CPU 23/KVM-5046    [001] d....  3410.005610: kvm_entry: vcpu 23
      CPU 23/KVM-5046    [001] d....  3410.005611: kvm_exit: vcpu 23 reason VMREAD
      CPU 23/KVM-5046    [001] d....  3410.005611: kvm_entry: vcpu 23
      CPU 23/KVM-5046    [001] d....  3410.

---truncated---